Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007201›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2026

Swing-Phase Plantar Stimulation and Gait Parameters in Patients With Diabetic Neuropathy: A Preliminary Study.

Iris Hoffmann, Justin Luk, Kendal Toy, Juliet Moncho, Jennifer A Skolnik, Sara E Rose-Sauld, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Atta Taseh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Iris HoffmannFoot and Ankle Research and Innovation Lab (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Justin LukFoot and Ankle Research and Innovation Lab (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1451-7842
Kendal ToyFoot and Ankle Research and Innovation Lab (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Juliet MonchoFoot and Ankle Research and Innovation Lab (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer A SkolnikFoot and Ankle Research and Innovation Lab (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sara E Rose-SauldFoot and Ankle Research and Innovation Lab (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Soheil Ashkani-EsfahaniFoot and Ankle Research and Innovation Lab (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2299-6278
Atta TasehFoot and Ankle Research and Innovation Lab (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7485-1500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) affects nearly 50% of patients with diabetes mellitus, leading to impaired balance and falls. Vibrotactile stimulation during walking is shown to improve gait performance, although the effects of targeted stimulations in the swing phase of gait are unexplored. This study investigated the effects of swing-phase vibrotactile stimulation on gait parameters in DPN. Methods: We conducted a prospective controlled study with the DPN group (DG) aged 18-75 years diagnosed with DPN and the control group (CG) with no diagnosis of diabetes. Participants completed 3-minute walk and Timed Up and Go tests with and without vibrotactile stimulation provided by smart shoes. The shoes measured gait parameters, including stride length, velocity, strike angle, heel clearance, swing-stance ratio, stride duration, and distance. Analysis included the Mann-Whitney Results: A total of 28 individuals were analyzed (CG n = 18; DG: n = 10). DG participants were of higher age and BMI compared with controls ( Conclusion: Our findings did not reveal an immediate effect of swing-phase stimulation on gait parameters in DPN patients. However, temporal gait parameters may require more demanding tasks or longer exposure to yield measurable benefits. Larger, age-matched trials using variability data are warranted to determine efficacy and identify responders in DPN. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Indexed as

FeedbackGait AnalysisSensoryWearable Electronic Devices

Identifiers

PMID42007201
PMCPMC13087356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.