ArticleCJC open2026
Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients After Implantation of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators to Improve Outcomes.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite its well established benefits, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is often underutilized following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. We sought to determine the rate of use of GDMT and whether a specialized intervention could improve GDMT and heart failure (HF) outcomes in a CIED clinic. Methods: This prospective quasi-experimental observational cohort study was performed from July 2020 to April 2022. Patients were included if they had a CIED with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%. The intervention consisted of a 12-month program in a specialized heart function clinic and device optimization. Controls were patients who were eligible but did not participate in the intervention. The outcome measures were improvement in GDMT use, N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide level (NTproBNP), New York Heart Association class, LVEF, and HF-related emergency department visits and/or hospitalizations. Results: After screening of 942 patients, 220 were identified as having an LVEF ≤ 35%, of which 58% were not on GDMT (intervention n = 29; control n = 99). In the intervention group, 54% of patients reached 4 classes of GDMT, compared to 2.1% of the control group ( Conclusions: This study demonstrates that a specialized HF intervention, designed to optimize GDMT in patients with CIEDs, was associated with an improved NTproBNP level and fewer HF-related emergency department visits and/or hospitalizations, highlighting an important addressable gap in the management of CIED patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.