ArticleData in brief2026
Dataset of physiological signals in the use of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS).
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article introduces a dataset that investigates the physiological responses of drivers when using advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) in real-world traffic conditions. The study, conducted in the Federal District, Brazil, involved seven drivers in controlled driving sessions. The time of day and the days of the week were standardized to ensure comparable traffic conditions. The data collection was centered on ADAS Level 2 systems, specifically the Lane Keeping Assist System (LKAS) and the Forward Collision Warning System (FCWS). The dataset includes five physiological signals: respiration, heart rate, galvanic skin response (GSR), leg muscle activity, and brain activity. These signals were continuously acquired using a dedicated instrumentation system installed in the vehicle. Given the complexity of collecting data under real traffic conditions, the acquisition sessions generated a large volume of raw data. Considerable post-processing was conducted to identify and segment portions of the signals with sufficient integrity for subsequent analysis. The dataset is structured as time-stamped raw signal spreadsheets, each corresponding to a specific driver and direction of the pre-established route (outbound and return). Such organization enables researchers to navigate the dataset easily, explore specific segments of interest, and conduct comparative analyses across participants and varying traffic conditions. The dataset is relevant to researchers in biomedical signal processing, driver state monitoring, intelligent transportation systems, and human-machine interaction. It may be used by academic laboratories investigating physiological responses during driving tasks, as well as by engineers and developers working on advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), including automotive manufacturers and ADAS technology suppliers. The dataset, which includes synchronized physiological and vehicle dynamics data collected under real traffic conditions may contribute to the study of human responses during semi-automated driving, supporting research and development of driver-centered mobility technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.