ArticleACS measurement science au2026
A Lightweight Data-Augmented Deep Learning Framework for Real-Time Instance Segmentation in Liquid-Phase In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy.
Article in ACS measurement science au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Static Structures to Molecular Dynamics: Emerging Directions in X-Ray and Electron Materials Characterization.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid-phase transmission electron microscopy (LPTEM) offers critical insights into the dynamic behaviors of materials, but automated analysis is hindered by the scarcity of annotated data and the high cost of image acquisition. To address these challenges, we propose an LPTEM deep learning framework that (i) closes the annotation gap, (ii) localizes nanoparticles through real-time detection, and (iii) preserves per-pixel detail. Through CycleGAN, we are able to generate a large number of images that are style-consistent with real LPTEM frames, effectively expanding the data set without manual labeling. After augmenting the data set, our fine-tuned YOLOv11n model achieves 97.66% precision and 99.05% mAP50 for detecting nanoparticles, closely approaching the performance of models trained on real data. Three Mobile-UNet variants, optimized for different computational efficiency and accuracy trade-offs, demonstrate instance segmentation for in situ TEM with intersection over union (IoU) scores ranging from 0.8685 to 0.9207 (on a scale where 1.0 indicates perfect overlap with the ground truth), indicating highly accurate particle shapes. Our integrated framework significantly enhances real-time detection and segmentation performance of nanoparticles in LPTEM, with YOLO + Mobile-UNet Slim achieving a real-time processing speed of 102.34 FPS. This framework establishes a scalable, annotation-efficient route to high-precision, real-time LPTEM analysis, opening the door to autonomous in situ experiments and accelerated materials discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.