ReviewDiscover public health2026
Barriers and facilitators of breast cancer screening services amongst black African women in high income countries: a systematic review and meta-aggregation.
Review in Discover public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Black African women are less likely to take up breast screening than other ethnic groups despite living in high income countries where breast screening is provided, to identify breast cancer early. Research often focus on access to breast screening in minoritised ethnic women generally, a heterogeneous group. A systematic review and a meta-aggregation were undertaken to synthesize the barriers and facilitators that influence utilization of breast screening services amongst Black African women in high income countries. Methods: Nine databases were searched- Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, British Nursing Index, PsycINFO, AMED and Embase. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and ENTEREQ guidelines for systematic review and meta-aggregation. 3153 articles were imported into Covidence, 23 articles were included in the study. Results: 21 out of 23 studies took place in the United States (US), only two studies were from the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia. The findings were synthesized into three main headings- Individual level barriers, service provider barriers and health system barriers. Individual barriers include lack of awareness/poor knowledge around breast cancer and breast screening services. Also, lack of understanding of preventive services, fear of breast cancer diagnosis, cultural barriers/stigma, religious barriers and practical barriers. Provider level barriers relate to attitude of staff and racial discrimination. There were system level barriers related to access to screening. Facilitators include prompts from service provider. Conclusion: This review revealed the need for country specific studies on barriers and facilitators to breast screening in Black African women, in order to develop targeted interventions that address the barriers distinctive to this population in high-income countries like the UK. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-026-01561-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.