ArticleDiscover public health2026
Peer perspectives on assisted partner notification for HIV and syphilis testing among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Uganda: a qualitative study.
Article in Discover public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The disproportionate burden of syphilis and HIV among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) is a global health challenge. We explored peer GBMSM perspectives on assisted partner notification (APN) for HIV and syphilis testing in Uganda. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 purposively selected GBMSM peers, guided by the socio-ecological framework. Data were analysed using both inductive and deductive content analysis. The median age of the 20 GBMSM peers was 27 years (interquartile range [IQR], 22-35 years). Peer views on APN services included (1) individual-level perspectives: APN services prompted willingness or reluctance to undergo testing, with privacy, autonomy, and cultural norms considered essential for delivering these services; (2) community-level perspectives: trusted peers were instrumental in reaching GBMSM in safe environments that health workers could not access. Peers navigated deep-seated mistrust of government health services while promoting APN services and addressing concerns about new self-testing methods; and (3) health system-level perspectives: Using digital platforms to connect with GBMSM expanded the reach of APN services, and printed educational materials were perceived as more effective than video content in communicating information related to APN. While financial incentives initially increased testing rates, their removal was accompanied by reported barriers to continued engagement in testing. Overall, APN services were perceived to increase HIV and syphilis testing, and success relied on addressing privacy and cultural concerns, building community trust, peer engagement, and utilising health system strategies like digital outreach. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-026-01724-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.