Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006999›Full record

ReviewVeterinary evidence

In cats with cranial cruciate rupture are better long-term outcomes achieved by surgical or conservative management?

Philip Montgomery

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary evidence. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PICO question: In cats diagnosed with isolated rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament, does surgical intervention result in improved long-term function, when compared with conservative management? Clinical bottom line: Category of research: Treatment. Number and type of study designs reviewed: One retrospective cohort study comparing surgical management and conservative management. Strength of evidence: Weak. Outcomes reported: This study evaluated and compared the long-term Feline Musculoskeletal Pain Index (FMPI) of patients with a cranial cruciate injury (39-87 months post injury). Patients that were managed conservatively showed statistically significant (P = 0.017) lower FMPI scores long term. Conclusion: Conservative management can be considered in cats presenting with isolated cranial cruciate rupture; however, further research is required to establish the optimum treatment in these cases. Given the limitations of this study and the current lack of evidence, clinicians must rely on their clinical judgement at this point when managing this condition until further research is available.

Indexed as

stress

Identifiers

PMID42006999
PMCPMC12710395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.