ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2010
Risk assessment of
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commodity risk assessment of debarked conifer wood chips fumigated with sulfuryl fluoride from the US.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Temporal and Spatial Variation in the Population Structure of SpanishJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Studying tree response to biotic stress using a multi-disciplinary approach: The pine pitch canker case study.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Transferability of PCR-based diagnostic protocols: An international collaborative case study assessing protocols targeting the quarantine pine pathogen Fusarium circinatum.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Commodity risk assessment of black pine (EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
- Article
- Pest categorisation ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2017Article
- Risk assessment ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Panel on Plant Health was asked to provide a risk assessment for Gibberella circinata Nirenberg and O'Donnell, for the EU territory, and to identify and evaluate effectiveness of risk management options in reducing the risk posed by the organism. G.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.