ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Breast ironing in Africa: a scoping review protocol.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast ironing is a harmful cultural practice reported in some African communities and, although often culturally justified, it is increasingly recognised as a violation of the rights of affected girls. This review aims to answer: (1) What is the prevalence of breast ironing? (2) What motivations are reported? (3) What are its health and social impacts? Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to map evidence on prevalence, drivers, consequences, and interventions related to breast ironing. Method and analysis: Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and Web of Science, with grey literature identified through Google Scholar and institutional repositories, including African Journals Online (AJOL). The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review methodology, and study selection will be reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full texts, while two reviewers will extract data. Findings will be synthesised using a descriptive analytical approach and presented as a structured narrative summary. Discussion: This review will strengthen the existing evidence base on the impact of breast ironing across Africa. Across studies, common motivations are expected to centre on perceived protection from sexual attention, early pregnancy, sexual violence, or forced marriage, while consistently reporting substantial physical harms-such as pain and tissue damage-and psychological consequences, including fear, shame, trauma, and loss of bodily autonomy. Recognising the practice within gender-based violence legislation may enhance legal accountability and protection for girls, while targeted training for healthcare providers and community-based education initiatives may support efforts to prevent the practice and mitigate its health and social consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.