ArticleBrain & spine2026
Accuracy and effectiveness of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement with a mixed reality head mounted device: first clinical experience and results.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mixed reality (MR) has the potential to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of spine surgery, particularly in the placement of pedicle screws. This technology can lead to improved outcomes, optimized ergonomics, and reduced operative time and costs. Research question: This study evaluates the efficacy and accuracy of MR in thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement using neuronavigation and a head-mounted device. Material and methods: We conducted a prospective review of the initial series of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placements utilizing neuronavigation (Brainlab) and MR with a head-mounted device (MagicLeap2). Data from 22 patients were analyzed, involving a total of 144 pedicle screws placed. The Gertzbein-Robbins classification (GRC) was used to assess screw position: Grade A (screw within the pedicle), Grade B (breach <2 mm), Grade C (breach 2-4 mm), Grade D (breach 4-6 mm), and Grade E (breach >6 mm). Grades A and B were considered accurate placements. Results: Out of 144 thoracolumbar pedicle screws, 139 were accurately positioned according to GRC grades A and B, resulting in a clinical accuracy rate of 96.5%. The mean deviation at the bone entry point compared to preoperative plans was 2.35 ± 1.1 mm, with a mean angular deviation of 3.1 ± 1.4°. Surgeons reported no issues with the head-mounted device, including dizziness or headaches, and noted no limitations in visualization of the surgical field. Discussion and conclusion: This study demonstrates the successful application of MR combined with neuronavigation for precise pedicle screw placement, eliminating the need for fluoroscopy and enhancing surgical efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.