ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2026
Stress-driven design of intervertebral disc implants and optimization of mechanical and biological performance.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From local tissue repair to systemic precision orthopaedics: recent advances in musculoskeletal regeneration and translational medicine.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The degeneration of the intervertebral disc (IVD) is a leading cause of low back pain, causing severe pain and spinal motion disorder. While spinal fusion remains the gold-standard treatment of IVD degeneration, it restricts spinal motion and accelerates adjacent segment degeneration. Artificial total disc replacement has emerged as an alternative to preserve mobility, but conventional implants often fail to replicate natural disc mechanics, resulting in high reoperation rates. This study aimed to propose a stress-driven design approach for graded IVD implants that have mechanical properties similar to those of natural discs, with good shock absorption and biocompatibility. Methods: A detailed finite element model of the L1-L2 functional spinal unit (FSU) was developed. Applying axial force of 500 N or 7.5 N⋅m moment, stress distributions of IVD under seven physiological motions (upright standing, flexion, extension, right/left lateral bending, and right/left axial rotation) were obtained. IVD implants were designed using gyroid unit cells (5 × 5 × 5 mm Results: The G65N and G65Y exhibited mechanical performance closest to those of natural IVDs, with G65N showing reduced sensitivity to loading rate, lower irreversible energy dissipation, and enhanced cyclic stability. The L1-L2 FSU implanted with G65N demonstrated stress ranges of 0.00009-26.600 MPa under compression and 0.00067-54.090 MPa under flexion, and it also showed lower endplate contact pressure (2.59 MPa) and axial displacement (1.86 mm), indicating a reduced risk of implant subsidence. In vitro, cells proliferated steadily on both the G65N and G65Y, aligning along the implant struts, with slightly higher proliferation observed on G65N. Furthermore, both implants exhibited high permeability (4.43 × 10 Conclusion: The stress-driven design of G65N reproduced the biomechanical behavior of natural IVDs and improved biocompatibility, offering a promising design strategy to minimize implant failure and promote tissue regeneration. The translational potential of this article: This study presents a stress-driven and patient-specific framework for graded IVD implant design. The optimal implants replicate the biomechanics of natural discs, improve load sharing, and support segmental stability, while demonstrating favorable biological performance. This design approach has significant potential to promote postoperative recovery and reduce the risk of reoperation, thereby supporting precision and patient-specific care in orthopedics. Beyond IVDs, the proposed stress-driven and biomimetic design strategy could be applied to other mechanically adaptive implants, such as femoral stems, knee and hip prostheses, shoulder prostheses, and dental implants, offering a versatile tool for the development of personalized orthopedic devices for various clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.