SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy of acupuncture plus pelvic floor muscle training in postpartum urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postpartum urinary incontinence (PPUI) significantly impacts women's quality of life. While pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is the standard care, its efficacy can be limited by poor adherence. Acupuncture is increasingly used as an adjunct therapy, but its added value remains controversial due to variability in clinical practice. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with PFMT for the treatment of PPUI. Methods: We searched eight databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), the Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and Wanfang, from inception to 30 October 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture plus PFMT with PFMT alone. The outcome measures included validated metrics (the 1-h pad test and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICI-Q-SF) score), and the total effective rate. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Nine RCTs involving 865 patients were included. For validated metrics, a narrative synthesis of the 1-h pad test and ICI-Q-SF scores showed a trend toward greater improvement in the acupuncture plus PFMT group compared with PFMT alone, although high clinical and statistical heterogeneity ( Conclusion: Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that acupuncture as an adjunct to PFMT may offer additional benefits in improving clinical symptoms and quality of life for women with PPUI. However, the high heterogeneity and methodological limitations of the current evidence preclude precise estimation of the effect size for objective outcomes. More rigorous, high-quality RCTs with standardized protocols are required to confirm these findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42020169815.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.