Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006877›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk of migraine in patients with allergic rhinitis.

Jiaqi Wu, Chao Wang, Fanqiang Meng, Hebo Wang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiaqi Wu *Hebei North University Graduate School, Zhangjiakou, China.
Chao Wang *Department of Neurology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Fanqiang MengHebei North University Graduate School, Zhangjiakou, China.
Hebo WangHebei North University Graduate School, Zhangjiakou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) and migraine are common chronic conditions that significantly impact patients' quality of life. Although observational studies suggest a potential link between AR and increased migraine risk, evidence remains inconsistent. Objective: To systematically evaluate the association between AR and migraine risk through a comprehensive meta-analysis. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CNKI were systematically searched up to July 2025. Observational studies investigating the association between AR and migraine were included. Data extraction, quality assessment, and meta-analysis were performed following PRISMA guidelines. Random-effects models were utilized, and subgroup analyses were conducted (by study design, age group, and effect measure). Sensitivity analyses (exclusion of cross-sectional studies, restriction to large-sample studies, use of unadjusted estimates, and leave-one-out procedures) were conducted to assess robustness. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots, trim-and-fill analysis, and Egger's regression test. Additional analyses included meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity, cumulative meta-analysis to assess temporal trends, and conversion of relative effects to absolute risk estimates. Results: Ten studies involving more than 4.8 million participants met the inclusion criteria. Pooled results indicated a significantly elevated risk of migraine among individuals with AR (OR = 2.75; 95% CI, 1.80-4.19; I Conclusion: Allergic rhinitis is significantly associated with an increased risk of migraine. Clinicians should be aware of this association and consider integrated management strategies for patients with comorbid AR and migraine. Systematic review registration: INPLASY2025110052.

Indexed as

allergic rhinitismeta-analysismigrainerisk factorsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42006877
PMCPMC13082992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.