Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006865›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Quantifying clinical indicators for identifying and prognosticating aspiration pneumonia in Chinese geriatric patients: a retrospective cohort study integrating multivariable regression and interpretable machine learning.

Weitao Cao, Lineng Xie, Gang Xu, Zhaoxing Lu, YuDong Hu, Zhuxiang Zhao, Qing Li, Wei Ma, Wenhui Wang, Jun Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Weitao Cao *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Lineng Xie *Department of Internal Medicine, Guangzhou Geriatric Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Gang Xu *Department of Geriatric Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Zhaoxing LuDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
YuDong HuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Tenth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Zhuxiang ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Qing LiDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Wei MaDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Wenhui WangInformation and Data Centre, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jun ZhaoDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Aspiration pneumonia (AP) substantially increases mortality risk among elderly patients, necessitating prompt diagnostic recognition and prognostic stratification. However, standardized diagnostic criteria and prognostic markers remain elusive. This investigation seeks to quantify high-contribution clinical parameters for the diagnosis and evaluation of AP prognosis, elucidate nonlinear risk interactions, and establish a comprehensive risk stratification framework tailored for Chinese geriatric populations. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis (2017-2018) enrolled 295 patients with pneumonia (aged 65-98 years) from Guangzhou First People's Hospital. The exposure variable was the diagnosis of AP, with the primary endpoints being 3-month mortality and recurrence rates. The adjustment variables encompassed demographic characteristics, comorbidities, biomarkers, and functional status. A dual-modeling approach was implemented: (1) multivariable multinomial logistic regression; (2) interpretable random forest algorithms incorporating SHAP/PDP analyses. Results: Conventional analytical approaches demonstrated significantly elevated 3-month mortality (17.3% vs. 5.9%) and recurrence rates (42.3% vs. 17.8%) in the AP cohort (both Conclusion: This dual-framework methodology amalgamates epidemiological rigor with artificial intelligence interpretability, allowing AP identification and prognostic evaluation through routine clinical parameters. This approach establishes a foundation for dynamic risk stratification in AP patients and contributes to improved clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

agingaspiration pneumoniaclinical indicatorslogistic regressionmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42006865
PMCPMC13083056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.