Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006848›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in urology2026

Case Report: Dual giant neobladder stones weighing 950 grams following 18-year loss to follow-up: surgical management and prevention strategies.

Youssef Maachi, Amine Boustani, Amine Salim Lalaoui, Amine Slaoui, Tarik Karmouni, Abdellatif Koutani, Khalid Elkhader

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Youssef MaachiDepartment of Urology, Université Mohammed V de Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
Amine BoustaniDepartment of Urology, Université Mohammed V de Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
Amine Salim LalaouiDepartment of Urology, Université Mohammed V de Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
Amine SlaouiDepartment of Urology, Université Mohammed V de Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
Tarik KarmouniDepartment of Urology, Université Mohammed V de Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
Abdellatif KoutaniDepartment of Urology, Université Mohammed V de Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
Khalid ElkhaderDepartment of Urology, Université Mohammed V de Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neobladder urolithiasis represents a significant long-term complication following radical cystectomy with orthotopic reconstruction, with incidence ranging from 3-9% for ileal neobladders to as high as 43% for Kock pouch configurations. Giant stones are rare and usually result from prolonged gaps in surveillance combined with inadequate preventive measures. Patient presentation: This is a case of a 78-year-old male presenting with progressive lower urinary tract symptoms after 18 years without urological follow-up following radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal neobladder reconstruction for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (pT2N0M0) performed in 2006. He had relocated geographically one year post-surgery and stopped all urological care, never performing self-catheterization or bladder irrigation as instructed. Computed tomography revealed two massive neobladder stones measuring 10×8×6 cm and 9×7×8 cm with 1,300 Hounsfield Units density. Open cystolithotomy successfully removed both calculi with a combined weight of 950 grams in 90 minutes with minimal blood loss of 100 mL and no complications. Stone analysis confirmed a pure struvite-carbonate apatite composition secondary to chronic Proteus mirabilis infection. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. Follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months demonstrated complete symptom resolution, stone-free status on imaging, and stable renal function. However, the patient was subsequently lost to follow-up again after 12 months despite multiple attempts at contact. Conclusions: This case, representing one of the heaviest dual-stone presentations documented in neobladder patients (950g combined weight), demonstrates that complete surgical excision via open cystolithotomy remains the treatment of choice for giant neobladder calculi. The exceptionally prolonged 18-year surveillance gap enabled progressive bilateral stone development, emphasizing the absolute necessity of lifelong structured follow-up programs for all urinary diversion patients. Comprehensive preventive strategies including daily bladder irrigation with 500-1000 mL normal saline, adequate hydration (≥2.5 L daily), aggressive infection control with surveillance cultures every 3-6 months and suppressive antibiotic prophylaxis when indicated, and regular imaging surveillance are essential to prevent such severe complications. Even after prolonged follow-up loss and massive stone development, curative intervention can achieve excellent outcomes when patients subsequently engage with comprehensive preventive protocols, as demonstrated by this patient's stone-free status during the 12-month compliant period.

Indexed as

adequate hydrationaggressive infection controlchronic proteus mirabilis infectiondaily bladder irrigationdual-stone presentationsgiant neobladder calculigiant stonesileal neobladder reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42006848
PMCPMC13082981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.