ArticleBMJ public health2026
How effective coverage has been used to measure quality in maternal and child health services in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate how effective coverage has been used to measure healthcare quality of maternal and child health services in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Design: Scoping review. Data sources: We systematically searched five indexed databases and grey literature for studies published from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2025. Eligibility criteria: All articles on global policy and those conducted in SSA were considered. All original articles that reported measuring effective coverage based on the WHO framework for maternal, newborn and child health were included in the review. Abstracts presented at meetings and conferences were eligible for inclusion. Other studies on 'Health care quality' were also considered. Data extraction and synthesis: We charted study characteristics, Maternal and Child Health (MCH) services, routine use and quality domains and compared crude service coverage with effective coverage. A descriptive synthesis and thematic analysis were conducted. Results: 21 studies met the inclusion criteria; 66.7% (n=14) were from East Africa, indicating poor and disproportionate use of effective coverage across SSA. Most studies on effective coverage used cross-sectional (n=19, 90.5%) and ex-post (n=12, 57.1%) data. Effective coverage lagged behind CC, thus revealing quality gaps. Despite the failures of health systems to adopt routine measurement of effective coverage, few studies (n=4) relied on data from national health registries to explore effective coverage. The review also noted mixed inequities in effective coverage with women from wealthier groups often benefiting the most in institutional deliveries as compared with their poor counterparts. This varied in the uptake in the case of antenatal and postnatal care services among users. The review has also revealed variability in the quality measures used to compute effective coverage. Conclusions: Effective coverage is critical for evaluating MCH service quality in SSA. Its underuse signals the need for stronger data systems, integrated quality assessment frameworks and standardised quality measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.