ArticleBMJ public health2026
Strengthening pandemic preparedness in Peru: a qualitative study of high-level leaders involved in the COVID-19 response.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical gaps in Peru's preparedness and response, including the absence of sustainable, intersectoral strategies to address systemic vulnerabilities and improve resilience. Through interviews with national leaders, we sought to identify key issues and actionable strategies for sustainable mechanisms that could improve preparedness and response for future pandemics. Methods: We conducted in-depth, semistructured key-informant interviews using snowball sampling to recruit 14 high-level leaders who were engaged in the COVID-19 pandemic response. Participants informed decision-making in Peru within health and other sectors, and within government, private sector, academia, multilateral agencies and non-governmental organisations. Data were analysed thematically. Results: Participants highlighted key challenges and opportunities in Peru's pandemic response. Two overarching themes emerged: (1) contextualising Peru's response, which explores the structural, cultural and systemic factors shaping the pandemic response, and (2) coordinating intersectoral mechanisms, which highlights the dynamics of collaboration, leadership and resource sharing across sectors. Participants emphasised the need to improve healthcare and emergency response systems, foster transparent and culturally sensitive communication, and institutionalise multisectoral collaboration. They also highlighted the importance of involving communities in planning and ensuring financial readiness for future emergencies. Conclusions: Findings emphasise the urgent need for a cohesive, sustainable approach to pandemic preparedness in Peru, emphasising robust multisectoral collaboration, equitable resource distribution and transparency. These recommendations provide a pathway to strengthen Peru's resilience and offer insights applicable to other low- and middle-income countries facing similar challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.