Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006754›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Access to and engagement with healthcare services among women with Children's Social Care involvement during the perinatal period who subsequently died: a confidential enquiry.

Kaat De Backer, Emma Rose, Caroline Bull, Oluwaseun Labisi, Allison Marjorie Felker, Kirsty Kitchen, Claire Mason, Elsa Montgomery, Jane Sandall, Abigail Easter and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kaat De BackerDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5202-2808
Emma Rose *Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, England, UK.
Caroline Bull *Rosie Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, UK.
Oluwaseun Labisi *Croydon University Hospital, London, England, UK.
Allison Marjorie FelkerNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3722-3181
Kirsty KitchenBirth Companions, London, UK.
Claire MasonCentre for Child and Family Justice Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0255-9428
Elsa MontgomeryFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4193-1261
Jane SandallDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-743X
Abigail EasterDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-6537
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-4575
Nicola VousdenNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5216-8268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the last decade, UK maternal death surveillance data have shown that among the women who died during pregnancy and the year after birth (the perinatal period), the proportion of women with Children's Social Care (CSC) involvement nearly doubled. Parental non-engagement in the context of CSC involvement has been described as a particular professional concern. Objective: To explore organisational and system barriers when accessing and engaging with healthcare services experienced by women with CSC involvement who subsequently died during the perinatal period. Methods: MBRRACE-UK national surveillance data were used to identify women who died during or in the year after pregnancy in the UK between 2014 and 2021 and who had CSC involvement. A confidential enquiry of healthcare records of a random sample of women with CSC involvement during pregnancy or in the year after the end of pregnancy and who subsequently died (n=47) was undertaken to explore barriers to care. Results: We identified four themes to describe the barriers faced by women with CSC involvement when accessing and engaging with healthcare services in the perinatal period: (1) burden of care, (2) disruption of care, (3) follow-up of non-attendance and (4) bias in care. Our findings highlighted the additional challenges that women had to contend with, while already facing multiple adversities in their daily lives. Conclusion: Our confidential enquiry found that the existing narrative of non-engagement among women with CSC involvement is unfounded for most women. Care for women with CSC involvement needs to be made trauma-informed, accessible and minimally disruptive.

Indexed as

FemaleHealth Services AccessibilityPublic HealthSociodemographic Factors

Identifiers

PMID42006754
PMCPMC13084787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.