ArticleBMJ public health2026
Prevalence and profiles of adverse childhood experiences: a French nationwide study using the CONSTANCES cohort.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can impact individuals' health later in life. In France, research on the prevalence and patterns of ACEs remains limited. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of different categories and profiles of ACEs in the French general population, and to explore their associations with childhood socioeconomic and demographic factors. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using retrospective data from the CONSTANCES cohort, a large population-based cohort study in France, including adults aged 18 to 69 years at enrolment. The analytic sample included 101 071 participants with complete data on ACEs. Prevalence and typology of ACEs was assessed using the Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire and examined individually, cumulatively and through latent class analysis (LCA) to identify exposure profiles. Associations with socioeconomic and demographic factors were examined using multinomial logistic regression, and all analyses were stratified by sex. Results: Overall, 65% of participants reported experiencing at least one ACE. Females were more likely than males to report certain experiences, including sexual violence. LCA identified three distinct ACE profiles in males (low exposure; physical and emotional violence; unstable family environment), and four in females (similar to males, with an additional class characterised by sexual violence). Class membership was associated with factors such as age, parental socioprofessional category and geographical origin. Conclusions: ACEs are highly prevalent in the French population and differ by sex. These findings emphasise the importance of social determinants, including gender and socioeconomic position, as risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.