Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006752›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Systemic review of the relative age effect in Scottish schooling: a public health imperative for policy reform and equity.

Andrew Stuart, Timothy Lynch, Xiaofen Hamilton, Wendy Goff, Qing Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew StuartEdinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Timothy LynchEducation, Yew Chung College of Early Childhood Education, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7096-541X
Xiaofen HamiltonEducation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Wendy GoffSchool of Education, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-2793
Qing LiuEducation, Yew Chung College of Early Childhood Education, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4187-2342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The relative age effect (RAE) is where an individual's age relative to their age-banded cohort influences various outcomes and has a globally observed pattern impacting health, academic performance and psychosocial development. Scotland's unique school commencement laws have resulted in extended schooling cohorts spanning up to 19 months, thus exacerbating RAE and subsequently widening health inequities. This research synthesises evidence to delineate the public health problem posed by RAE in the Scottish educational context and proposes evidence-based policy interventions. Design: A comprehensive policy brief methodology was employed, integrating a systematic literature review with extensive stakeholder engagement and detailed analysis of local data, including Scottish Government statistics. Data sources: Web of Science and EBSCOhost databases were searched, along with Scottish Government statistics. Eligibility criteria: Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study Design frameworks and targeted search terms were used for study selection. Data extraction and synthesis: Ethical approval was obtained, and Sex and Gender Equity in Research and patient and public involvement considerations were integrated. Results: Analysis of Scottish data reveals increasing school entry deferral rates, particularly among children born in January and February. Furthermore, the trend appears to be influenced by government funding for additional childcare. This deferral appears to disproportionately favour white ethnic backgrounds, boys and higher socioeconomic strata, widening inequities. More so, RAE is associated with increased physical injury rates, adverse mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, suicide), higher incidence of learning disabilities, diminished academic attainment and reduced psychosocial development (lower self-esteem and fewer leadership opportunities). Extended 19-month cohorts, such as the one offered in the Scottish education system, are predicted to amplify these disadvantages. Conclusions: The existence of extended 19-month schooling cohorts in Scotland represents a significant, yet under-recognised, public health issue. This structural anomaly perpetuates and exacerbates existing inequities in child development and well-being. A strategic realignment of default school entry with the legally stipulated age, complemented by multi-faceted RAE-mitigation strategies, offers a pragmatic, evidence-based and equitable pathway to improve holistic child health and developmental outcomes across the Scottish population.

Indexed as

Community HealthEducationPrimary PreventionSchool Health ServicesScoping Review

Identifiers

PMID42006752
PMCPMC13084823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.