Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006751›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Full alcohol marketing ban and adolescent drinking patterns: a repeated cross-sectional analysis comparing Lithuania with other EU countries.

Daniela Correia, Jakob Manthey, Anastasia Månsson, Peter Allebeck, Ludwig Kraus, Jürgen Rehm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Alcohol policy modelling studies require realistic assumptions.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniela CorreiaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8886-3211
Jakob MantheyCentre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anastasia MånssonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter AllebeckDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ludwig KrausCentre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jürgen RehmCentre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5665-0385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Alcohol consumption is a leading cause of premature mortality in Europe, with adolescents particularly vulnerable to marketing influences. While alcohol marketing bans are considered a WHO 'best buy', evidence of their effectiveness remains limited. Lithuania's 2018 full national ban on alcohol marketing offers a unique opportunity to assess its impact on adolescent drinking. This study evaluated whether adolescents in Lithuania reported greater declines in alcohol use compared with peers in European Union countries without a full ban. Methods: We conducted a difference-in-difference analysis using generalised linear regression models to assess alcohol use among adolescents. We used data from the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs for 15-16 year-olds in Lithuania and five comparator countries (Estonia, France, Italy, Latvia and Poland) across four waves (2007, 2011, 2015 and 2019; n=84 189). The study follows a prespecified and published protocol. The primary outcome was self-reported frequency of intoxication in the past 12 months, assessed by negative binomial regression models adjusted for individual and country-level covariates. Results: Compared with statutory control for some alcoholic beverages, a full marketing ban was associated with a 35% reduction in frequency of intoxication (incidence rate ratios (IRR) 0.65 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.77)). Sensitivity analyses confirmed this association. Without the ban, predicted intoxication frequency in 2019 would have been nearly twice as high (1.28 vs 0.73 occasions). Additional analyses showed significant reductions in the odds of any intoxication (OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.78)). Protective associations were also observed for alcohol use (IRR 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.99)) and binge drinking (IRR 0.82 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.92)). Conclusions: The implementation of full alcohol marketing bans was associated with reduced risky drinking behaviours among adolescents in Lithuania. Our findings support full bans as a central component of alcohol control, especially in the digital age, where partial restrictions are easily circumvented.

Indexed as

AdolescentPublic Healthtrends

Identifiers

PMID42006751
PMCPMC13084893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.