ArticleJournal of aerosol science2026
Subject-Specific Whole-Lung CFPD Coupled with PBPK/PD to Predict Inhaled Bronchodilator Response in Asthmatic and Healthy Subjects.
Article in Journal of aerosol science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of bronchodilator performance remains challenging. We present a coupled computational fluid and particle dynamics (CFPD) and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PBPK/PD) framework that leverages subject-specific CT-derived airway trees and airflow distributions to model regional lung exposure and the resulting clinical effect, quantified as the change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (ΔFEV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.