ArticleEuropean journal of personality2026
Modelling non-linear personality change surrounding transitions: A review of statistical approaches.
Article in European journal of personality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personality changes surrounding transitions in life circumstances are often non-linear, presenting challenges for statistical analysis. This paper therefore reviews approaches to modelling non-linear personality change surrounding transitions, aiming to guide readers in selecting and applying an approach that fits their objectives. Seven approaches were reviewed, including traditional mixed-effects methods, continuous-time dynamic models, and relatively novel data-driven techniques. Each approach is explained, outlining its strengths and limitations. The approaches' practical utility is assessed through a case study examining changes in life satisfaction surrounding widowhood, using LISS panel data. Interpretability and model fit are compared, and annotated R code is provided as a tutorial for implementation. Results highlighted the varied suitability of the mixed-effects approaches for studying different aspects of change. The data-driven techniques excelled in capturing average and person-specific trajectories, generalised effectively, and allowed interpretation of different change aspects than the mixed-effects approaches allowed for. Importantly, the approaches yielded distinct findings regarding life satisfaction changes surrounding widowhood, with theoretical implications. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for selecting and applying these approaches. By expanding the reader's statistical toolkit and providing an accessible overview, this resource supports the effective analysis of non-linear changes surrounding transitions, enabling a fuller understanding of personality change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.