Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006632›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2026

Rapid food desensitization supported by omalizumab, with adjunctive dupilumab for type 2 comorbidities: A pediatric case series.

Pedro Giavina-Bianchi, Bruna Giavina-Bianchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pedro Giavina-BianchiClinical Immunology and Allergy Division, Universidade de São Paulo School of Medicine, Brazil.
Bruna Giavina-BianchiClinical Immunology and Allergy Division, Universidade de São Paulo School of Medicine, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The therapeutic landscape of IgE-mediated food allergy is expanding, and Rapid Food Desensitization (RFD) has been proposed as an optional and innovative procedural strategy to provide rapid protection in selected high-risk patients. However, real-world evidence integrating RFD with biologic therapy remains scarce, and its optimal role within contemporary management strategies is still evolving. Objective: To describe a real-world pediatric case series of RFD supported by targeted biologic therapy in children with severe IgE-mediated food allergy, including those with additional Type 2 inflammatory multimorbidities. Methods: We conducted a prospective real-world case series of 3 consecutive pediatric cases managed under a standardized institutional RFD protocol. Clinical data were collected prospectively at each visit and during RFD using a standardized clinical report form within REDCap. All patients received omalizumab prior to RFD, and those with prominent Type 2-driven diseases also received dupilumab. Clinical evolution, desensitization outcomes, safety, and maintenance of daily ingestion following transition to oral immunotherapy (OIT) were evaluated. Results: All 3 patients had a history of severe food-induced anaphylaxis, and 2 had clinically relevant Type 2 multimorbidities (atopic dermatitis or eosinophilic esophagitis). Omalizumab enabled RFD to be performed safely by suppressing the immediate IgE-mediated response, while dupilumab was used reactively in selected cases to control persistent Type 2 inflammation. All patients achieved successful desensitization without severe breakthrough reactions and subsequently transitioned to OIT. At latest follow-up, all maintained daily ingestion of desensitized foods, with only mild, manageable symptoms in 1 case. Conclusion: This real-world pediatric case series suggests that RFD, when supported by omalizumab, is a feasible, safe, and innovative-yet optional-procedural approach for carefully selected high-risk patients. Omalizumab facilitated rapid protection, and targeted use of dupilumab may provide additional benefit in patients with overlapping Type 2 inflammatory pathways. Given the very small sample size and absence of a control group, these findings are hypothesis-generating. Larger, rigorously designed prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection, timing of biologics, and long-term outcomes of this evolving strategy.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisDupilumabFood allergyIgEImmunomodulationMonoclonal antibodyOmalizumabRapid food desensitization

Identifiers

PMID42006632
PMCPMC13084806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.