Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006625›Full record

ReviewRe/views in environmental science and bio/technology2026

Dewatering assessment of sewage sludge: a remaining challenge.

Javier Pavez-Jara, Leon Korving, David Jeison, Merle K de Kreuk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Re/views in environmental science and bio/technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Javier Pavez-JaraDepartment of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6118-0330
Leon KorvingWetsus, European Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Water Technology, Oostergoweg 9, 8911 MA Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
David JeisonEscuela de Ingeniería Bioquímica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Av. Brasil 2085, 2362803 Valparaíso, Chile.
Merle K de KreukDepartment of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved sewage sludge dewaterability saves costs in biosolids transport and disposal, making reliable dewaterability assessment essential for both research and full-scale process evaluation. However, laboratory-based indexes commonly used to predict dewatering performance often show limited correspondence with full-scale results. Nonetheless, indexes such as capillary suction time (CST), sedimentation and centrifugation methods, specific resistance to filtration (SRF), and mixed dead-end techniques show biases when trying to resemble full-scale results. In our present article, we pose that lack of predictability originates from overlooking all the phenomena involved in the dewatering process. Four critical phenomena are identified to occur during dewaterability: (1) mixing of sludge and conditioner; (2) suspension destabilisation; (3) flocs formation, and (4) compression and expression. By systematically evaluating widely used laboratory indexes this review shows that these methods capture only part of the dewatering process and generally fail to represent the compression and expression stages that ultimately determine the ultimate achievable solids concentration. The analysis highlights sludge compressibility as a critical factor limiting the predictive capacity of conventional indexes. Based on this synthesis, centrifugation, dead-end filtration, and combined centrifugation-filtration approaches are identified as more suitable methods for laboratory-scale assessment because they better represent the compression behaviour of sludge. The review provides a conceptual framework linking dewatering phenomena with experimental assessment methods, supporting the development of improved evaluation strategies and facilitating the testing of emerging, environmentally friendly conditioning technologies. Graphical abstract:

Indexed as

CentrifugationConditionersDewaterabilityDewateringFiltrationSludge

Identifiers

PMID42006625
PMCPMC13086726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.