ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2026
A comprehensive review of intelligent question-answering systems in traditional Chinese medicine based on LLMs.
Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are advanced deep learning models with billions or even trillions of parameters, enabling powerful natural language processing and knowledge reasoning capabilities. Their applications in the medical domain have been rapidly expanding, spanning medical research, clinical diagnosis, drug development, and patient management. As a cornerstone of China's healthcare system, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) faces significant challenges, including difficulties in knowledge extraction, and lack of standardization. The emergence of TCM-focused LLMs presents a transformative opportunity, offering a novel technological framework to process vast amounts of TCM data, uncover hidden theoretical insights, and enhance both research and clinical applications. Despite the growing interest in artificial intelligence (AI)-driven medical solutions, systematic research on LLMs in the TCM domain remains limited. This article provides a comprehensive review of LLM development, detailing their underlying mechanisms, training methodologies, and key technological advancements. It further explores the unique characteristics and diverse application scenarios of existing TCM-LLMs. Additionally, this study also conducts a horizontal comparison of the differences between intelligent question-answering (QA) systems on general LLMs and QA systems on TCM-LLMs, discusses challenges and potential risks, and offers strategic recommendations for future development. By synthesizing current advancements and addressing critical gaps, this work aims to support the continued modernization and intelligent evolution of TCM, fostering its integration into contemporary healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.