Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006621›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2026

A comprehensive review of intelligent question-answering systems in traditional Chinese medicine based on LLMs.

Qilan Xu, Tong Wu, Yiwen Wang, Xingyu Li, Heshui Yu, Shixin Cen, Zheng Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qilan XuCollege of Pharmaceutical Engineering of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
Tong WuCollege of Pharmaceutical Engineering of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
Yiwen WangCollege of Pharmaceutical Engineering of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
Xingyu LiCollege of Pharmaceutical Engineering of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
Heshui YuCollege of Pharmaceutical Engineering of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
Shixin CenCollege of Pharmaceutical Engineering of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
Zheng LiCollege of Pharmaceutical Engineering of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are advanced deep learning models with billions or even trillions of parameters, enabling powerful natural language processing and knowledge reasoning capabilities. Their applications in the medical domain have been rapidly expanding, spanning medical research, clinical diagnosis, drug development, and patient management. As a cornerstone of China's healthcare system, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) faces significant challenges, including difficulties in knowledge extraction, and lack of standardization. The emergence of TCM-focused LLMs presents a transformative opportunity, offering a novel technological framework to process vast amounts of TCM data, uncover hidden theoretical insights, and enhance both research and clinical applications. Despite the growing interest in artificial intelligence (AI)-driven medical solutions, systematic research on LLMs in the TCM domain remains limited. This article provides a comprehensive review of LLM development, detailing their underlying mechanisms, training methodologies, and key technological advancements. It further explores the unique characteristics and diverse application scenarios of existing TCM-LLMs. Additionally, this study also conducts a horizontal comparison of the differences between intelligent question-answering (QA) systems on general LLMs and QA systems on TCM-LLMs, discusses challenges and potential risks, and offers strategic recommendations for future development. By synthesizing current advancements and addressing critical gaps, this work aims to support the continued modernization and intelligent evolution of TCM, fostering its integration into contemporary healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Large language models (LLM)Traditional Chinese medicine-large language modelsTraditional Chinese medicine question-answering systems

Identifiers

PMID42006621
PMCPMC13091288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.