ArticleCHEST critical care2025
Needs of Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors Throughout 1 Year of Recovery: A Qualitative Analysis Using the Timing It Right Framework.
Article in CHEST critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough ICU mortality is declining for the > 1 million Americans with acute respiratory failure (ARF) annually, little evidence exists to guide care after hospital discharge, and few studies have explored longitudinal care needs among survivors. RESEARCH QUESTION: To ultimately develop dynamic, adaptable care plans across recovery trajectories, what are the barriers and facilitators to ARF survivor recovery? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsAfter hospital discharge, we enrolled survivors of ARF discharged from 4 University of Pennsylvania Health System hospitals from June 2022 through April 2023 who underwent mechanical ventilation for $ 24 hours into a longitudinal cohort study. We enrolled a subset of this cohort to conduct qualitative structured phone interviews at 3, 6, and 12 months regarding barriers and facilitators to recovery using the Timing It Right (TIR) framework, which identifies longitudinal changing needs. We coded interview data and performed thematic analysis to identify unmet and met needs. Using TIR framework recovery constructs, we sequentially mapped needs categorically and then across time points.
resultsThirty-two patients participated in 59 interviews. Themes mapped to informational, instrumental, and emotional TIR framework recovery aspects across discharge preparation, transition to community, and long-term adjustment recovery phases. During discharge preparation, patients required rapport with inpatient clinicians and comprehensive information about the rehabilitation process. During transition to community, patients needed instrumental support, including increased touchpoints from health care professionals. As recovery continued, the mental and emotional burden of recovery became prominent.
interpretationSurvivors of ARF encountered evolving support needs throughout the recovery trajectory from informational needs during discharge preparation to instrumental needs during transition to community and emotional needs during long-term adjustment. Understanding needs trajectories is a critical first step toward developing guidance to mitigate unmet needs and developing dynamic, adaptable care plans across recovery trajectories among survivors of ARF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.