ArticleCureus2026
Why Low Outflow Facility and Low Aqueous Production May Be Risk Factors in Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation: A Goldmann-Based Perspective.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) lowers intraocular pressure (IOP) by reducing aqueous humor production, yet the magnitude of its effect varies considerably among eyes and may occasionally lead to hypotony. Based on the Goldmann equation, in which IOP is expressed as IOP = episcleral venous pressure (EVP) + (aqueous humor production (F) - uveoscleral outflow (U)) / outflow facility (C), the pressure reduction induced by aqueous suppression can be approximated as ΔIOP (change in IOP) = dF (change in F) / C, when EVP and U are assumed to be constant. This relationship indicates that the IOP response to ECP depends not only on the degree of aqueous suppression but also strongly on the conventional outflow facility. A conceptual model assuming a fixed preoperative IOP demonstrates that eyes with low outflow facility exhibit a steeper pressure response to aqueous suppression and that eyes with low baseline aqueous production are mathematically linked to such low outflow states. These findings suggest that eyes characterized by both reduced aqueous production and impaired outflow may be particularly susceptible to excessive IOP reduction after ECP. Clinically, this includes conditions such as neovascular glaucoma with extensive angle closure, uveitic glaucoma, and glaucoma in elderly patients. The model presented is based on simplified assumptions, including constant episcleral venous pressure and uveoscleral outflow, and may not fully account for alterations in the pressure-flow relationship under pathological conditions; therefore, it should be interpreted with caution as a conceptual framework with limited physiological generalizability. However, the present conceptual framework provides a theoretical explanation for variability in ECP outcomes and suggests that securing a certain level of outflow facility prior to aqueous-suppressive procedures may be a reasonable strategy in selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.