ArticleEJIFCC2026
An optimized method for setting Internal Quality Control targets (mean and limits) for multi-instrument Internal Quality Control strategies in hematology?
Article in EJIFCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Internal Quality Control (IQC) procedures must evolve as laboratory practices change to meet the requirements of higher patient volumes and the greater need for comparability of results across laboratories. This study developed a strategy to detect significant errors in routine hematology analytical processes using a novel approach to setting IQC material targets (mean and limits) across multiple instruments. This has not been described for hematology laboratories before. Content: The approach described used a common IQC sample mean and limits determined from a manufacturer-based peer group using the same IQC material. The limits involved a new parameter, the random error of the peer group analyzers around their own mean (SD Summary: The model effectively controls analytical error in a network of laboratories using the same measurement system. This model aligns with the best theoretical principles for patient risk reduction and harmonizes practices for acceptance and rejection across the network. Outlook: The model presents an approach to IQC that meets the demands of real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42006507PMC13088489What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.