ArticleEJIFCC2026
Laboratory Professionals' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Laboratory Medicine: Insights from a National Survey in Albania.
Article in EJIFCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming Laboratory Medicine, successful AI integration depends on the readiness of healthcare professionals. This study aimed to assess the perspectives of Albanian laboratory professionals toward AI integration in medical laboratories. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, voluntary, and anonymous survey using Google Forms. The survey link was distributed to all members of the Albanian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine and their affiliated staff. The survey explored General Information and Demographics, Digital Properties and Health Data Access, and Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Laboratories. Responses were automatically collected over four weeks and were analyzed to investigate laboratory professionals' perspectives. Results: A total of 220 laboratory professionals completed the survey. 30% of participants were laboratory doctors and 70% were laboratory technicians. Participants expressed a generally optimistic outlook on AI integration in medical laboratories, believing it could streamline routine workflows and save time (74%), simplify repetitive tasks (70%), reduce work-related stress (61%), improve analytical accuracy and precision (57%), and reduce costs and enhance efficiency (49%). The main barriers to AI integration were considered high cost of implementation, the lack of appropriate IT infrastructure, the lack of specialized staff, and ethical considerations. Significant differences were observed among various subgroups, but interest in AI training prevailed among the majority of respondents. Conclusion: This survey highlights a generally positive perspective on AI among laboratory professionals in Albania, alongside a strong interest in AI education. According to the survey respondents, strengthening digital infrastructure and promoting training programs will be essential for AI integration in laboratory medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42006504PMC13088422What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.