ArticleVeterinary medicine international2026
The Uterine Microbiota in Mares With Endometritis: Impacts of Antibiotic Treatment.
Article in Veterinary medicine international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Equine Reproductive Microbiota: Composition, Dynamics, Dysbiosis, and Implications for Fertility in Mares and Stallions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- The Uterine Microbiota in Mares With Endometritis: Impacts of Antibiotic Treatment.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite growing interest in the role of the reproductive microbiota, the uterine microbiota of mares has been only scarcely investigated using sequencing approaches. The aims of this study were to describe the uterine microbiota of mares with endometritis and the effects of antibiotic treatment using both 16S rRNA sequencing and culture. Five mares with clinical signs of endometritis and a positive bacteriological culture were enrolled. During the follicular phase (T0), uterine samples were collected using a double-guarded cytobrush and swab for microbiome and bacteriological analysis, respectively. Following the antimicrobial susceptibility test, they were treated with intrauterine infusions of ceftiofur sodium, and samplings were repeated during the subsequent follicular phase (T1). According to bacterial culture, at T0,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.