ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
Patient-clinician communication and cardiovascular outcomes: An analysis of the hispanic community health study/study of latinos (HCHS/SOL), 2008-2019.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Strong patient-clinician communication may improve health outcomes for Hispanic/Latino individuals. Objective: We assessed the association between patient-clinician communication and cardiovascular (CV) events or death in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). Methods: HCHS/SOL is a longitudinal cohort study of individuals aged 18-74 who identified as Hispanic/Latino at 4 U.S. metropolitan areas. Participants' ratings of communication with clinicians during the year before enrollment were used to generate a 3-level communication score. The primary outcome was the composite of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure events (HF), stroke, and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes included the components of the primary outcome. The association between the baseline communication score and outcomes of interest was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for possible confounders. We also used multivariable linear regression to assess the cross-sectional association between communication and AHA Life's Essential 8 (LE8), a measure of CV risk factors. All analyses accounted for the complex survey design. Results: Our sample included 10,527 individuals without prior CV events and at least one medical encounter in the year before enrollment. The median age at enrollment was 41 years (IQR 29, 53), 59% were female, and 71% perceived high-quality communication with clinicians. The mean follow-up time was 9.4 years. High-quality communication was associated with the following results in our fully adjusted analyses: composite outcome (aHR 0.73; 95% CI 0.51, 1.03; Conclusions: High-quality patient-clinician communication was associated with a non-significant trend toward a lower rate of CV events and death, driven by a significant association with lower all-cause mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.