Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006401›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026

The Association of p27 With Prostate Cancer Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of NRG/RTOG 8610 and 9202.

Krishnan R Patel, Stephanie L Pugh, Jeffry P Simko, Anthony Zietman, Michelangelo Fiorentino, David Paul D'Souza, Seth Rosenthal, Adam Currey, Adam Dicker, Bradley J Stish and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Krishnan R PatelRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland.
Stephanie L PughNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jeffry P SimkoUCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion, San Francisco, California.
Anthony ZietmanMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michelangelo FiorentinoUniversity of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
David Paul D'SouzaVerspeeten Family Cancer Centre, London Health Sciences Centre & Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Seth RosenthalSutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Roseville, Roseville, California.
Adam CurreyThe Medical College of Wisconsin and Zablocki VAMC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Adam DickerThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Bradley J StishMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Eric M HorwitzFox Chase Cancer Center and the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Tyler P RobinUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Michael DominelloWayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan.
Christopher PetersNROC, Dunmore, Pennsylvania.
Kwang ChoiUniversity Hospital at Downstate, Brooklyn, New York.
Jason A EfstathiouMassachusetts General Hospital/Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Samir NarayanMichigan Cancer Research Consortium - Trinity Health Ann Arbor Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
George Daniel GrassH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Zaker H RanaUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Phuoc T TranDepartment of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Massimo LodaNYP/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Paul L NguyenBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
Resource Sharing CoreU54CA273956 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Luigi Marchionni · 2022 to 2026
$8.9M
NCI, National Clinical Trials Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAPS) UG1 (funded extension)UG1CA232760 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Judy Caroline Boughey, Aaron Scott Mansfield · 2019 to 2026
$8.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067NCI NIH HHS U54 CA273956NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA232760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 is a well-profiled modulator of cell cycle progression. Low nuclear p27 levels have been demonstrated to have a negative prognostic impact on outcomes in patients undergoing prostatectomy. The prognostic value of p27 after radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer is unknown. Methods and materials: Levels of p27 were evaluated in pre-RT prostate biopsy samples from 2 randomized, phase 3 trials, NRG/RTOG 8610 and 9202, which treated patients with RT with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Nuclear p27 was analyzed using immunohistochemistry and quantified using automated imaging analysis. The association of p27 as both a continuous and categorical measure (≤ median vs > median) with clinical outcome was estimated using both univariable (UVA) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. The primary clinical outcome measure was overall survival, and secondary measures were disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival, distant metastases, and biochemical failure. Results: In the analytical cohort ( Conclusions: This study produced insufficient evidence to conclude that nuclear p27 level is prognostic of outcome in patients undergoing RT ± ADT. The observed trend was opposite in direction to the prior observations in the postprostatectomy literature, which served as a basis for this study. Given this, these data generate the hypothesis that the negative prognostic value of low nuclear p27 level in patients undergoing prostatectomy may be obviated by the receipt of RT ± ADT. Although this does appear congruent with known mechanistic differences between the two treatments, further studies are required to confirm this finding.

Identifiers

PMID42006401
PMCPMC13091121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.