Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006385›Full record

ReviewVeterinary evidence

In dogs, is concurrent laser treatment more effective at treating osteoarthritis compared to NSAIDs alone?

Ciar Fitzpatrick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary evidence. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PICO question: In dogs with osteoarthritis (OA) is concurrent laser treatment more effective than non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) in reducing the severity of clinical signs associated with OA? Clinical bottom line: Category of research: Treatment. Number and type of study designs reviewed: One randomised controlled trial. Strength of evidence: Weak. Outcomes reported: The study showed that laser therapy significantly improved the Helsinki pain score, reduced the NSAID dose and improved the lameness score compared to the control group whose lameness scores did not improve at all. Conclusion: It is suggested that laser therapy may be effective at reducing clinical signs of osteoarthritis (OA) and therefore reducing the requirement for higher non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) doses. However, due to the power of the evidence being weak and limited, further clinical studies would be needed to confirm results and conclude whether laser treatment is superior to NSAID treatment.

Indexed as

ANALGESIACANINELASER THERAPYNON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGSOSTEOARTHRITISPAIN MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID42006385
PMCPMC13011137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.