ArticleiScience2026
Mitigating age-related stereo decline with perceptual training.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aging is accompanied by visual decline, largely driven by central rather than peripheral changes. Encouragingly, however, the aging brain is neuroplastic. Here, we used perceptual learning to improve stereoscopic depth perception in older and younger observers, comparing their learning capacity and transferability across two depth tasks: signal-in-noise and fine discrimination. Ninety participants (45 younger and 45 older) were randomly assigned to train on one of the tasks or to a no-training control. All participants completed pre- and post-tests on both tasks, with training groups receiving training over three consecutive days. Despite lower baseline performance, older adults exhibited learning rates and magnitudes comparable to those of younger adults. In both age groups, fine discrimination training improved performance on both tasks, whereas signal-in-noise training yielded task-specific gains. Our findings demonstrate that the human binocular visual system retains substantial plasticity that is governed by mechanisms that remain effective with age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.