ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2026
Sotorasib in Advanced
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04667234 (A Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm, Expanded Access Protocol of Sotorasib for the Treatment of Subjects With Previously Treated Locally Advanced Unresectable/Metastatic NSCLC With KRAS p.G12C Mutation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm, Expanded Access Protocol of Sotorasib for the Treatment of Subjects With Previously Treated Locally Advanced Unresectable/Metastatic NSCLC With KRAS p.G12C Mutation
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Data from two global protocols under the expanded access program, Study-436 and Study-442, evaluating the safety and efficacy of sotorasib in patients with advanced Methods: Patients were enrolled in 90 centers globally. Baseline characteristics and safety data for Study-436 and Study-442 and efficacy data for Study-436 were estimated. All data were summarized descriptively. Results: A total of 268 patients (n = 150 [Study-436] and n = 118 [Study-442]) received oral sotorasib (960 mg daily). At baseline, 21.3% and 31.0% of patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 and a history of central nervous system (CNS) metastases, respectively.Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 64.9% of patients; diarrhea (31.3%) was the most common. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar between patients with ECOG PS 0 to 1 (67.8%) and PS 2 (54.4%) and those with (69.9%) and without (62.7%) a history of CNS metastases. The median real-world progression-free survival and overall survival was 6.3 and 9.5 months, respectively. The median real-world progression-free survival was numerically similar in patients with ECOG PS 0 to 1 versus PS 2 (6.5 versus 5.6 mo) and in patients with versus without a history of CNS metastases (5.7 versus 6.5 mo); median overall survival followed similar trends. Improvement from ECOG PS 2 to ECOG PS 0 to 1 was observed by the end of first cycle of treatment (57.9%). Conclusions: Safety and efficacy outcomes of sotorasib in this study were not affected with ECOG PS 2 and the history of CNS metastases and were consistent with those reported in key clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.