ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2026
Cost-Effectiveness of Perioperative Immune Checkpoint Therapy for NSCLC in Japan, the United States, and Brazil.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly being used to treat lung cancer perioperatively. Although ICI use has led to long-term improvements in patient outcomes, its high costs have increased medical expenses. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of perioperative ICI therapy for NSCLC in Japan, the USA, and Brazil. Methods: Hazard ratios of disease-free survival and overall survival for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant plus adjuvant therapy with ICI were estimated from landmark phase III trials using a network meta-analysis. A partitioned survival model was used to estimate quality-adjusted life-years and life-years. Drug and hospitalization costs were included using standard regimens as of April 2023, discounted at 2% annually. Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-years for neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with no perioperative treatment was ¥714,940 ($4468) in Japan. That for neoadjuvant therapy by ICI compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was ¥5,285,770 ($33,036). The ICERs for other regimens were not calculated because of their dominance. In the USA and Brazil, the ICERs for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were $32,726 and $29,320, respectively, whereas those for neoadjuvant therapy with ICI were $228,467 and $92,573, respectively. Conclusions: The ICER threshold in Japan is generally ¥5 million and ¥7.5 million for essential drugs such as anticancer agents. The ICER of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was lower than the former threshold, whereas that of neoadjuvant nivolumab was lower than only the latter threshold. Therefore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is cost-effective in Japan, the USA, and Brazil, whereas neoadjuvant nivolumab is only cost-effective in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.