ArticleACS bio & med chem Au2026
MAPK Pathway Inhibition Reshapes Kinase Chemical Probe Reactivity Reflecting Cellular Activation States.
Article in ACS bio & med chem Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the pivotal role of oncogenic kinases in cancer initiation, progression, and therapeutic resistance, functionally profiling their activity and conformational dynamics in live cells remains challenging. Existing methods often fail to capture inhibitor-bound structural states of kinases, particularly in clinically relevant contexts, such as treatment response and acquired resistance, where genomic data alone are insufficient. Here, we use activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) to monitor composite amino acid reactivity changes, across cysteine, lysine, and carboxylic acid residues, as a hypothesis-generating readout of kinase state in live cells. Using electrophilic probes, we show that treatment of BRAFV600E mutant melanoma cells with vemurafenib or trametinib decreases overall cysteine and lysine reactivity in BRAFV600E and MEK1/2, likely reflecting composite changes in amino acid accessibility across multiple reactive residues associated with inhibitor binding. Changing the order of probe addition and inhibitor treatment altered the labeling outcomes, consistent with competitive engagement and structural stabilization. Comparative analysis of ATP-competitive BRAFV600E inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib indicated differences in aspartate and glutamate labeling patterns, consistent with the possibility that ABPP may detect inhibitor-associated variations in residue accessibility, which could reflect differences in inhibitor-bound conformations. In inhibitor-resistant melanoma models, ABPP detected differences in residue reactivity relative to parental cells, which aligned with known resistance-associated features, such as BRAF overexpression and the MEK2 Q60P activation mutation. Moreover, global proteome analyses of cysteine and lysine reactivity upon BRAFV600E inhibition revealed probe-accessible cysteine labeling changes on KSR2, suggesting a potential MAPK pathway remodeling. Together, these findings highlight ABPP as a valuable chemical biology approach for investigating inhibitor-dependent changes in kinase residue reactivity, offering a framework to investigate how kinase conformational dynamics and signaling pathway adaptation influence the therapeutic response and resistance in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.