Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006218›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2026

Outcomes and Trade-offs of Thailand's 2022 Patient-Choice Dialysis Policy Reform.

Jeerath Phannajit, Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa, Kriang Tungsanga, Vuddhidej Ophascharoensuk, Talerngsak Kanjanabuch, Piyatida Chuengsaman, Chulathip Boonma, Kinanti Khansa Chavarina, Yot Teerawattananon, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeerath PhannajitDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kearkiat PraditpornsilpaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kriang TungsangaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Vuddhidej OphascharoensukFaculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Talerngsak KanjanabuchDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piyatida ChuengsamanKiddee Kidney Care Peritoneal Dialysis Center, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chulathip BoonmaHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Kinanti Khansa ChavarinaHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Yot TeerawattananonHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Wanrudee IsaranuwatchaiHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In February 2022, Thailand transitioned from a 14-year "peritoneal dialysis (PD)-first" policy to a "patient-choice" model, allowing unrestricted modality selection. This study evaluated the patient- and system-level impacts of this policy change on access, providers, expenditure, and outcomes. Methods: We linked nationwide administrative datasets (2018-2024). System-level trends in dialysis prevalence, incidence, and mortality were evaluated using interrupted time-series analysis. We further examined the program expenditure and shifts in care provision between the public and private sectors. For incident patients, we compared demographics, unplanned initiations, and hemodialysis (HD) vascular access use. All-cause mortality was modelled using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for key covariates. Results: Following the policy shift, dialysis utilization expanded rapidly; HD replaced PD as the dominant modality, driving increased incidence. Provision shifted to private providers, accompanied by more unplanned starts and prolonged use of temporary catheters. Expenditure increased by 74% from 2018, reaching USD 452 million in 2024. This accounted for 9.3% of the national health budget in a country with a GDP per capita of USD 7350. All-cause mortality increased, particularly within the first 90 days of treatment. Postpolicy initiation was associated with higher mortality, as were unplanned initiation, older age, and comorbidities. Conclusion: The reform resulted in rapid service expansion, requiring a substantially higher proportion of public funding and correlating with increased mortality. These findings underscore the importance of refining policy implementation strategies, including appropriate patient selection and implementing robust safeguards to ensure the integrity and sustainability of the national health system.

Indexed as

dialysis policyhealth system reformhemodialysisperitoneal dialysisThailanduniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID42006218
PMCPMC13087778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.