ArticleVeterinary evidence
Ultrasonographic detection of cranial cruciate ligament pathology in canine stifles without cranio-caudal instability.
Article in Veterinary evidence. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conservative management of cranial cruciate ligament injury in an Asian small-clawed otter (Aonyx cinereus).The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026Article
- Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease (CCLD): A Concise Review of the Recent Literature.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: Objective: Explore the value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in detecting canine cruciate ligament pathology. Background: Partial tears of the cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) can be difficult to diagnose due to the lack of instability present on orthopaedic examination. Advanced diagnostics would be required for further evaluation. While a common tool in human medicine, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is of limited use in canines due to cost and the need for general anaesthesia. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) can be performed without anaesthesia but there are no current studies to date evaluating its usefulness in detecting partial tears of the cranial cruciate ligament. Evidentiary value: This is a retrospective case series of 32 dogs that underwent diagnostic MSK-US of the stifle who later had a surgical procedure (stifle arthroscopy / arthrotomy) to evaluate the intra-articular space. Methods: Medical records were evaluated between May 2014 - April 2020 for canines with clinically stable stifles that underwent both an MSK-US of the stifle followed by stifle surgery. Ultrasound findings of the CCL were compared to surgical findings. Results: Compared to surgical findings, ultrasound was a very sensitive test in detecting CCL pathology however it is less specific. Its sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 100%, 58.3%, 81.5%, and 100% respectively. Conclusion: MSK-US is a non-invasive test that can be performed with little to no sedation. Using a high frequency 18-5 MHz linear transducer, MSK-US is a sensitive test for detecting partial CCL injuries in dogs and may aid in its diagnosis for canines without stifle instability and be useful in guiding treatment. As it is less specific, arthroscopy or arthrotomy would be necessary to further confirm the intra-articular pathology. Application: Diagnostic MSK-US is a non-invasive tool that can be used to detect CCL pathology in the canine stifle. Its application can help guide treatment recommendations prior to a more invasive diagnostic / therapeutic procedure such as surgery or arthroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.