Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006116›Full record

ArticleCurrent health sciences journal

Comparative Analysis of Adolescent and Adult Drug Use Profiles: Sociopsychological and Behavioral Insights from a DUDIT-Based Evaluation.

Raluca Dănoiu, Ana Maria Bîzdoacă, Maria Davițoiu, Iulia Robertina Tudorașcu, Cristina Elena Negroiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raluca DănoiuSanocare Medical Center Craiova, Romania.
Ana Maria BîzdoacăUniversity of Craiova, Romania.
Maria DavițoiuDoctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Iulia Robertina TudorașcuDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Cristina Elena NegroiuDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug use harms physical and mental health and disrupts family, social, and work life. We compared substance-use patterns in adolescents versus adults across sociopsychological and behavioral domains. Sixty participants who acknowledged psychoactive-substance use were enrolled: 30 adolescents (16-17 years) and 30 adults (18-47 years). The Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) and a brief sociological questionnaire were administered. Adolescents reported more polydrug use (p<0.001) and were more likely to take drugs the morning after a heavy session (p=0.029). Adults showed higher craving (p=0.041), greater guilt (p=0.033), more confrontations about use (p=0.044), and felt more heavily influenced by drugs (p=0.003). Adults also reported more health problems attributable to use (p=0.005) and a higher rate of specialist treatment (p<0.001). Total DUDIT scores were higher in adults, although the difference was not significant (p=0.127). Cannabis was the most commonly used substance in both cohorts, consistent with European trends; highly harmful drugs (e.g., cocaine, amphetamines, heroin) were rarely reported. Most adults lacked a stable romantic relationship, and all participants came from non-traditional family structures, suggesting early relational instability may shape later substance-use trajectories. These findings delineate distinct age-related profiles: adolescent use is characterized by experimentation and binge-linked patterns, whereas adult use is marked by dependence-related features and greater clinical consequences.

Indexed as

Drug useDUDIT testmental health

Identifiers

PMID42006116
PMCPMC13086468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.