ArticleCurrent health sciences journal
Comparative Analysis of Adolescent and Adult Drug Use Profiles: Sociopsychological and Behavioral Insights from a DUDIT-Based Evaluation.
Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug use harms physical and mental health and disrupts family, social, and work life. We compared substance-use patterns in adolescents versus adults across sociopsychological and behavioral domains. Sixty participants who acknowledged psychoactive-substance use were enrolled: 30 adolescents (16-17 years) and 30 adults (18-47 years). The Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) and a brief sociological questionnaire were administered. Adolescents reported more polydrug use (p<0.001) and were more likely to take drugs the morning after a heavy session (p=0.029). Adults showed higher craving (p=0.041), greater guilt (p=0.033), more confrontations about use (p=0.044), and felt more heavily influenced by drugs (p=0.003). Adults also reported more health problems attributable to use (p=0.005) and a higher rate of specialist treatment (p<0.001). Total DUDIT scores were higher in adults, although the difference was not significant (p=0.127). Cannabis was the most commonly used substance in both cohorts, consistent with European trends; highly harmful drugs (e.g., cocaine, amphetamines, heroin) were rarely reported. Most adults lacked a stable romantic relationship, and all participants came from non-traditional family structures, suggesting early relational instability may shape later substance-use trajectories. These findings delineate distinct age-related profiles: adolescent use is characterized by experimentation and binge-linked patterns, whereas adult use is marked by dependence-related features and greater clinical consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.