ArticleCurrent health sciences journal
Comparison between Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Dance in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although dance is understudied in the context of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), it is a physical activity that can improve individuals' psychological state and physical function. The aim of this research was to compare the impact of physical training using dance versus pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on functional capacity, lung and muscle function, and quality of life (QoL) in COPD patients. This randomized controlled clinical trial involved 11 patients who underwent dance (DG) and 11 patients who underwent PR (PRG). The patients were evaluated using the following assessments: the mMRC scale, the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), spirometry, handgrip strength (HGS), the 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) test, and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). In the intra-group comparison, the DG showed an increase in 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) (p=0.003), a reduction in the mMRC scale, and an improvement in the SF-36 physical functioning and vitality domains. In the intra-group comparison, the PRG showed an increase in 6MWD (p=0.007), a reduction in the mMRC scale, an increase in HGS, an increase in the 1-RM test, and an improvement in all SF-36 domains. In the comparison between groups, the PRG showed an improvement in QoL in the following domains: general perceptions of health and limitations of physical and emotional roles. In conclusion, for patients with COPD, a dance program has the potential to improve functional capacity, the degree of dyspnea, and QoL. However, when compared to a PR, dance is less effective in addressing muscle dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.