ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2026
Early Mobilization Outcomes With Tenecteplase Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke (EMOTE-TNK) Study: Safety and Tolerability.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of early mobilization among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) receiving intravenous (IV) tenecteplase (TNK). We hypothesized that physical therapy and occupational therapy would be relatively safe and tolerable when mobilization was attempted shortly after thrombolysis. Patients and Methods: In this single-center, single-arm retrospective cohort study, we included adults with AIS treated with IV TNK who underwent first physical therapy or occupational therapy screening and mobilization 13 hours or more but less than 24 hours after thrombolysis. The primary outcome was mobilization-associated adverse events (AEs; screening through the immediate recovery period). Tolerability was defined by whether patients could continue mobilization after screening. We used health record data to determine stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, modified Rankin scale score), vital signs, AE type, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurring after thrombolysis but before mobilization. Results: Of 180 patients, 159 (88.3%) underwent early mobilization without any AE. Twenty-one patients (11.6%) had an AE (orthostasis, dizziness, pain, heart rate >120/min, or systolic blood pressure >180 mm Hg); all were mild, transient, and not life threatening. Adverse events were significantly associated with baseline mean arterial pressure ( Conclusion: Early mobilization (<24 hours after IV TNK) was relatively safe and well tolerated. Our findings suggest that screening-based early mobilization strategies can be integrated into standardized protocols for select patients with AIS receiving TNK.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.