ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Audiology2026
Understanding Hearing Aid Use and Nonuse of Adult Hearing Aid Recipients: A Qualitative Content Analysis.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Hearing loss results in various challenges that can be mitigated by the use of hearing aids. Despite their benefits, hearing aids are often not worn consistently. Improved use of hearing aids can be supported by understanding the challenges and motivations that users experience. This study explored hearing aid recipients' reasons for hearing aid use and nonuse. Method: A cross-sectional survey design was used and a qualitative content analysis was applied to responses from an open-ended question in an online survey distributed to American hearing aid users in the Hearing Tracker and Lexie Hearing databases. Results: The study included 680 hearing aid recipients 18 to 93 years of age. The findings were structured around two domains, namely, reasons for hearing aid use and reasons for hearing aid nonuse. Within these two domains, the following three categories were identified: (1) personal factors; (2) situational aspects; and (3) hearing device-related factors. These three categories consisted of 11 subcategories within the use domain and 24 subcategories within the nonuse domain. Personal motivations for use included reliance on hearing aids for essential daily functioning and communication, whereas nonuse was often driven by self-consciousness and discomfort. Device-related aspects highlighted the positive impact of streaming and connectivity features, whereas nonuse was frequently attributed to the users' perceived need for fine-tuning. Situational factors were also important. Users valued their hearing aids for environmental awareness and safety; however, concerns about fear of damage (e.g., moisture damage) led to decreased hearing aid use. Conclusions: Addressing personal apprehensions, improving device comfort and functionality, and acknowledging situational preferences are essential for supporting adherence and satisfaction among hearing aid users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.