Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005961›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

The green spark of partial reform: Evidence from China's electricity market experiment.

Xinya Hao, Ao Sun, Feng Song, Huanhuan Zheng, Lin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinya HaoSchool of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9300-0186
Ao SunSchool of Applied Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Feng SongSchool of Applied Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Huanhuan ZhengDepartment of Public and International Affairs, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0928-839X
Lin ZhangSchool of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5945-5451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can incremental market reforms stimulate clean energy transitions in coal-dependent systems? China's electricity spot market pilot in Guangdong, which is a regulated experiment in partial liberalization, reveals how even limited market exposure can spark systemic transformation. Leveraging quarter-hourly, unit-level generation data, and a novel causal inference approach, we demonstrate that the implementation of market mechanisms decreased coal-fired power output by 6.6% while increasing renewable utilization and system flexibility reserves. The "green spark" originated from two mechanisms: (i) exposing cost structure differences between inflexible coal units and near-zero-marginal-cost renewables and (ii) reducing renewable curtailment through market-driven dispatch. However, the reform's decarbonization potential was partially offset by an increasing dependence on gas-fired and small coal units for flexibility. While partial marketization can drive energy transitions, legislative safeguards are needed to address flexibility gaps. These insights guide developing economies in accelerating renewable adoption through incremental institutional innovation.

Indexed as

energy transitionflexibility provisionrenewable curtailmentspot market reformsustainability

Identifiers

PMID42005961
PMCPMC13089487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.