Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005917›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Sex ratio disparities in the two most common cancers worldwide: an exploratory analysis using GLOBOCAN 2022 data, gender inequalities, and economic indicators.

Amalia Martinez, Léna Bonin, Pascale Grosclaude, Michelle Kelly-Irving, Cyrille Delpierre, Sébastien Lamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amalia MartinezEquity Team, CERPOP UMR 1295 Inserm Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Léna BoninEquity Team, CERPOP UMR 1295 Inserm Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Pascale GrosclaudeEquity Team, CERPOP UMR 1295 Inserm Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Michelle Kelly-IrvingEquity Team, CERPOP UMR 1295 Inserm Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Cyrille DelpierreEquity Team, CERPOP UMR 1295 Inserm Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Sébastien LamyEquity Team, CERPOP UMR 1295 Inserm Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung and colorectal cancers are the most common non-sex-specific cancers worldwide and represent a major share of global incidence and mortality. Although international variations in incidence are well documented, the contribution of structural gender inequalities and economic context to these disparities remains insufficiently explored. This study explores how gender inequalities and economic context relate to male-to-female incidence sex ratios of lung and colorectal cancers in a subset of 29 countries. Methods: We conducted an ecological analysis using GLOBOCAN 2022 data. The study included 29 countries with high-quality and comparable data on gender inequality, economic indicators, and cancer incidence. Associations between the Gender Inequality Index (GII), gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, and incidence sex ratios were examined using multivariable linear regression models. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess robustness, including exclusion of influential countries and log-transformed models. Findings: Structural gender inequalities, measured by the GII, were strongly associated with higher male-to-female incidence sex ratios for lung cancer, and this relationship persisted after adjustment for smoking prevalence. This suggests that social and structural mechanisms beyond behavioural risk factors contribute to sex disparities in lung cancer incidence. For colorectal cancer, economic context was the principal determinant of sex differences in incidence, while associations with gender inequality were limited and variable. In more gender-equal, high-income countries, colorectal cancer incidence tended to converge between men and women, likely reflecting increasingly similar exposures and lifestyles. Interpretation: These findings highlight the importance of integrating structural gender inequalities and macroeconomic context into analyses of cancer incidence. Incorporating such social determinants alongside behavioural and biomedical risk factors may improve the relevance of prevention strategies and cancer surveillance efforts, particularly in high-income settings. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the ecological design of the study and the limited ability to account for all potential confounding or mediating factors. Funding: This project was funded by the Gender and Health Inequalities (GENDHI) project, ERC-2019-SyG grant agreement No. 856478.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerEconomic contextGender inequalitiesLung cancerSex ratio of cancer incidence

Identifiers

PMID42005917
PMCPMC13084316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.