Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005915›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Accurate Prediction of Humphrey 10-2 Visual Fields in Glaucoma from a Single Rapid IMOvifa 24plus(1-2).

Yuka Igari, Euido Nishijima, Kei Sano, Aiko Iwase, Tadashi Nakano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuka IgariDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Euido NishijimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei SanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Aiko IwaseTajimi Iwase Eye Clinic, Tajimi, Japan.
Tadashi NakanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Predicting the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 10-2 visual field (VF) using machine learning (ML) based on IMOvifa 24plus(1-2) VF data. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Participants: Seventy actual IMOvifa 24plus(1-2) tests from 25 patients (The Jikei University School of Medicine) and 3472 synthesized IMOvifa 24plus(1-2) tests from 884 patients who underwent HFA 24-2 and HFA 10-2 VF measurements at 4 affiliated hospitals. Methods: Synthesized 24plus(1-2) data were created by merging 54 points from HFA 24-2 and 24 points from HFA 10-2 tests. An XGBoost model, trained on the synthetic data set, predicted thresholds at the 68 HFA 10-2 test locations. Model performance was assessed on the actual data set using leave-one-out cross-validation. Stratified patient-level bootstrap analyses accounting for multiple tests per patient were used to compare results across 3 glaucoma severity groups (mild, moderate, and advanced) based on HFA 10-2 mean deviation. Four models utilizing different input subsets were evaluated: model 1 (all 78 IMOvifa 24plus[1-2] points), model 2 (54 points of 24-2), model 3 (central 40 points of 24plus[1-2]), and model 4 (central 16 points of 24-2). Test durations were also compared. Main Outcome Measures: Mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R Results: Model 1 (all 24plus[1-2] points) achieved the highest overall accuracy (MAE 3.59 dB, RMSE 5.71 dB, R Conclusions: Incorporating the additional central test points from the IMOvifa 24plus(1-2) significantly enhances the accuracy of ML based HFA 10-2 VF prediction. This approach offers an efficient strategy for obtaining detailed central VF information from a single, rapid test, potentially improving glaucoma management. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Central visual fieldGlaucomaIMOvifaMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42005915
PMCPMC13084673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.