ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Deep Learning-Driven Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis of Murine Optic Nerve Myelinated Axons.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a deep learning-based method for automated quantification of retinal ganglion cell axons in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, addressing the time-consuming and subjective nature of manual segmentation and quantification. Design: Development and validation of a deep learning-based segmentation and quantification pipeline for TEM images of murine optic nerves. Subjects: Three hundred sixty-eight optic nerve TEM images from 23 C57BL/6J and DBA/1J mice (4-9 months old) under different experimental conditions were used to develop and validate this algorithm. Methods: Murine optic nerves were dissected and imaged using TEM at ×3000 magnification. A deep learning model based on the nnU-Net architecture was trained to segment the circumferences of inner axons and outer myelinated fibers. Postprocessing operations, including morphological gap closing and removal of incomplete axons, were then performed. Quantitative measures, such as axon count, diameter, area, G-ratio, and myelin thickness, were derived from the segmentation masks. Main Outcome Measures: Segmentation performance metrics (precision, recall, F1-score) and morphometric measures (axon count, axon diameter, G-ratio, myelinated axon area, and myelin thickness). Results: The nnU-Net model achieved an inner axon F1-score of 0.771 and an outer myelinated fiber F1-score of 0.697. Quantitative measures derived from model predictions showed high concordance (R Conclusions: Our deep learning-based pipeline provides reliable and robust quantification of myelinated axons in murine TEM images, significantly reducing manual effort, processing time, and subjectivity. Financial Disclosures: The author has no/the authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.