ReviewAEM education and training2026
Bringing Medical Care to the Streets: Lessons Learned in Launching a Street Medicine Outreach.
Review in AEM education and training, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bringing Medical Care to the Streets: Lessons Learned in Launching a Street Medicine Outreach.AEM education and training · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Street Medicine, where healthcare is provided in non-traditional settings, provides care to people experiencing homelessness (PEH). Street medicine has been shown to improve patients' health and decrease Emergency Department visits, making it a cost effective way to provide medical care to PEH. Methods: This paper is based on the SAEM25 didactic session as conducted in Philadelphia, where a panel of providers who are directly involved in street medicine clinics shared their experiences and perspectives on the various designs in practice. These topics included key logistical challenges and solutions, barriers to care and trust building, strategies for fostering sustainable partnerships with community organizations, and options for medical student or resident involvement. Results: The design and unique approach of four different universities across the country was compared and contrasted by a panel of experts, all with experiences working directly with PEH. There are similarly identified barriers to providing care to PEH including location and transportation, financial and food insecurity, and trust between the community and the healthcare system. Conclusion: There are multiple options that exist to provide a framework to create a clinic to support populations of PEH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.