ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
A Cross-Sectional Study on the Impact of Emergency Department Boarding and Crowding on Emergency Department Observation Unit Patient Populations.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Emergency Department (ED) boarding affects patient flow and clinical decision making, but its impact on ED observation unit (EDOU) utilization remains unclear. In this study, we examine whether ED boarding census levels are associated with changes in the characteristics, care processes, and outcomes of patients placed in the EDOU. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of all adult EDOU encounters from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 in a single academic ED (∼120,000 annual visits) with a 31-bed EDOU staffed by ED clinicians. Encounters were stratified into quartiles of ED boarding census (number of admitted patients boarding ≥2 hours). Patient demographics, encounter characteristics, resource utilization, and outcomes were compared using χ Results: Among 8,469 encounters, patient characteristics remained largely consistent across boarding quartiles. Most diagnostic testing and imaging did not vary significantly. Higher boarding levels were associated with longer ED-to-EDOU times and modest increases in specialty consultations, ultrasounds, and echocardiograms. Admission rates were slightly higher in the highest boarding quartile compared with the lowest. EDOU length of stay increased incrementally with higher boarding levels. Conclusions: ED boarding levels were not strongly associated with changes in EDOU patient characteristics, management, or outcomes. Structured eligibility criteria and dedicated review processes likely insulated EDOU use from short-term operational pressures. Modest increases in consultations, diagnostics, and admissions suggest that slightly more complex patients may be placed in the EDOU during periods of high boarding. Overall, EDOU function remained relatively stable, supporting its role as a consistent throughput mechanism even during ED crowding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.